Civil Rights in the Uk
By: Garry Crystal (25 Feb 24)
In America there has been a long history of civil rights abuse towards African-Americans, but in the UK during the 1950s and 1960s civil rights were also lacking. In 1963 a young black protester in Britain echoed the action of Rosa Parks in America and began a bus boycott that helped bring in Britain’s anti-discrimination law.
Early History of British Immigrants
The slave trade in Britain was first documented around 1562 and by the early 18th century there were 14,000 black people living in Britain. Few had any real freedom, and it was not until the abolitionists began protesting that slavery across all of the British Empire was banned in 1833. By 1892 Britain had its first Indian Member of Parliament, Dadabhai Naoroji. After World War II 150,000 Poles arrived in Britain along with hundreds of men from the West Indies and multi-cultural Britain had arrived.
The Mass Migration
During the 1950s Britain invited workers from the Caribbean especially Jamaica to fill job vacancies such as labourers and transport workers in order to help rebuild post war Britain. As the rise in immigration continued so too did the rise in racial violence in cities such as London, Birmingham and Nottingham. The government began to curb immigration and by 1972 non-whites could only settle in Britain with a work permit or if they had parents or grandparents who were born in Britain. By 1970 the amount of non-white residents in the UK numbered 1.4 million, although a third of this number were born in Britain.
Racial Discrimination in the UK
Racial discrimination in Britain during the postwar period was rife. Many of the immigrants were skilled workers but racism and discrimination meant that semi or unskilled work was the only option. By the 1960s the economy in Britain was declining and black workers were the first to lose their jobs. Those that did manage to keep jobs usually did double the work for less pay. The racism and discrimination in Britain echoed that felt in America at the time, although on a smaller scale.
The Civil Rights Pioneer
There were a number of black people who made a difference to the civil rights of the black population in Britain. One was Paul Stephenson, who in 1963 led a boycott against a racist public bus company. The Bristol bus company operated a colour bar that refused employment to blacks or Asians. Stephenson, a 26 year old teacher, organised the 60 day bus boycott on the city’s buses. Thousands of people supported the bus boycott and the news of the racism made headlines. By the 28 August 1963 the bus company lifted the employment colour ban. This was the same day that Martin Luther King Jr made his “I have a dream speech”.
Anti-Discrimination Laws
Mr Stephenson would once again hit the headlines when he stood trial for refusing to leave a pub until he was served a beer. It was not uncommon to see signs in Britain during the 1960s proclaiming, “No blacks, no Irish, no dogs”. Both cases helped to highlight the treatment of blacks and Asians in Britain during this period. During Prime Minister Harold Wilson’s term (1964-1976) he introduced tighter controls on immigration but also introduced legislation that made racial discrimination a legal offence.
Racial Discrimination
Racial discrimination is now a legal offence in the UK and these civil and human rights are afforded to every man, woman and child. Racial discrimination includes discrimination on the grounds of colour, race, nationality and ethnicity. It is an offence to discriminate on these grounds in areas such as employment, education, housing, and the provision of goods and services. It is also an offence for public authorities such as the police or government departments to discriminate in its activities on these grounds.
Other Civil Rights UK
Racial discrimination is not the only discrimination that can be pursued as a legal offence. It is also an offence to discriminate on the grounds of religion, sexuality, gender and disability. Discrimination for any of these reasons can lead to legal consequences. It is important that people are aware of their civil rights in the UK as it is the best protection they have against discrimination.
Racial discrimination and the abuse of civil rights did not end when the anti-discrimination legislation was passed in the 1960s. But this legislation did mean that anyone who practiced discrimination could face legal consequences. The fight for equality and freedom has been a struggle in America, Britain and many other countries around world. Hopefully this struggle will help future generations live in a more equal society.
Further Reading
Ask for Advice or Share Your Story...
Anonymous6 February 2024
So the evidence is compelling Owen Jones exposes Conservative MP GOVE about owning PARFORCE (DAVID IRVING) PUBLICATIONS and yet when asked through LONDON LBC NEWS and THE GUARDIAN NEWSPAPER to file a complaint to the NUJ about Racists Sympathizer Albert Smith formely of The Irish Independent Newspaper apppearing inside of Parforce publications as Parpoint describing them as quote "Good offerings" he doesnt want to know or get involved !!!!
Owen Jones is empowered to do so but refuses....this is without doubt a dishonest journalist thaat receives reliable information and simply disregards it.Trust US both radio staios ad his newspaper the Guardian where issued with press releases...
J - 25-Feb-24 @ 10:28 PM
A few months back somebody contacted Guardian Journalist Owen Jones.
Why ...well he projects himself as a radical leftist journalist
that in the past exposed MP Gove owning Parforce publications.
We are hoping that as a journalist he will file a complaint
Its no longer in some ways about Journalists but about the
British System in particular the NUJ protecting NUJ journalists that support convicted racist David Irving.
Owen is an NUJ member of the Guardian newspaper,all NUJ members
are EMPOWERED to make complaints against racists sympathizers.
Further it is against National Union of Journalists policy to allow
its members to provide copyrighted work to convicted Nazi sympathizers.
al - 11-Nov-23 @ 12:57 AM
In Math its impossible that Parpoint publishing isnt derived from {PAR}force and Focal{Point} as these three companies appear in the same Holocaust denial publication Goring Biography…and so the Irish police should question British National Union of Journalist member Albert Smith if he intended to name his publishing outlet after Convicted racist David Irvings organization on the grounds that if he lies the courts can decide…
al - 11-Nov-23 @ 12:50 AM
I don't have any rights I agree with Steve on 08/08/2023 post that has now mysteriously disappeared from this sight yeah matt jukes of London go tell moiron I coming in if not I see her Saturday for a nice long chat plus Don'tforget your library card and stop lachams and Co drug gangs coming after
Fred - 10-Aug-23 @ 12:52 PM
I offen troll my family members on social media but then again I Don't work in CALIfornia
Life of - 9-Aug-23 @ 10:20 AM
Pleasecontact 101 or 999 please stop you trolling
Matt - 8-Aug-23 @ 6:52 PM
FOUND THIS YESTERDAY NEW ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE NUJ.
George H, on September 1, 2022 at 8:15 pm said:
Conspiracy or reality ??
The following evidence below is conclusive beyond any doubt whatsoever
Smith is found in the digital version of Gorings Biography inside
of the Introduction.If for a second we ask ourselves how many words
there are in existence then its impossible for Smith not to have
named his company Parpoint after both parforce and Focal Point why then is this journalist/publisher still a member of the NUJ,they are aware
that he has worked with convicted publisher David Irving.
thats the real conspiracy theory right there
—————————————————————
ALBERT SMITH IRISH INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER
Reddit/r/u_wikifreaks888 , 2022-08-01,
British NUJ member Albert Smith advertiss himself upon Linkedin as Parpoint,he is also found upon the internet providing his own personal introduction to the antisemitic,racist digital production of Gorings Biography (written by the feared convicted neo nazi sympathizer David Irving.)
Recent “net” allegations surrounding this book claim that Smith a former editor of the Irish Independent newspaper named his publishing company after the copyright and publishing agents found within the publication named as Parforce and Focal Point.The obvious question we now ask ourselves is should the National Union of Journalists be held legally accountable for Parpoints past activities when today racist criminals use their members provided copyright??
HB - 3-Sep-22 @ 2:06 AM
W I K I F R E A K S W.W.V 16458825 Why is the NUJ not being investigated over racist allegations? 1
/r/londontown , 2022-03-05, 21:38:07
W I K I F R E A K S W.W.V 16458825 Why is the NUJ not being investigated over racist allegations?
??
**W.W.V 16458825 w.w.v copyright owned.**· 20 minutes ago·
W I K I F R E A K S W.W.V 16458825 Why is the NUJ not being investigated over racist allegations?
There are now two "camps" to choose from if thats the right word to use on whether or not to believe Wikifreakz recently claimed "blogged out " quote that London Town UK has finally become a despotic separatist state" is a reasonable assumption.The reasoning being is that there are so many obvious dividing issues . Prince Andrew finally bringing the credibility of Monarchy to an end and Police Commissioner Dick resignation cementing far right extremism within law and order are both examples of why you should flee from London, which itself has become a completely lawless and extremely dangerous area to operate in.
It seems without doubt the only road left for ordinary "sane" citizens is to contemplate the formation of a Republic.Last year saw Metropolitan Police Officers convicted of being terrorists with murder and rape convictions of Police officers becoming a regular common occurence.This is for many of us the last straw of brainwashing and brain damage that broke the Kamalis bank.
As leftist Socialist bloggers, who are always getting followed and our doors for ever getting “kicked in” by the far right wing door smashers for no reasoning at all we really arent taking any more chances not being a great fan of political violence or believing in the use of any political violence its time to disappear like woooshhh ….and unlike certain conservative writers and neo journalists who live in the land of the Care free and Fairies we have a moral duty to report racism and far right extremism firstly without being murdered for it, and secondly without being called delusionary ?? think about that whilst its still a human right to so but dont tell anyone just in case!...
Politicians and alleged antifascist organizations have remained mysteriously quite about the Bellingcat allegations concerning the National Union of Journalist members and so It is with great sadness that some of us state here that weve decided very recently never to enter into the London Metropolitan area of Fireland as they call it ever again or until it turns into a real Republic basically because its not worth risking our lives .Until their UK/Britain ever becomes a Republic where people are no longer treated as potential "Stateless" entities well be staying well clear of.
The recent written synopsis filled against the NUJ found on the net finalized our beliefs that the main press tabloids in this country and Europe are NOT to be totally believed or accepted anymore in their present format.
The National Union of Journalists should be held legally accountable for allowing
jez - 10-Jun-22 @ 1:14 PM
The police are very good at cover-up and denying human rights. Subject Data requests have to be pressed home. They depend on dragging out the process and the person running out of funds. Just keep plugging away. The ICO is nearly as useless as the police. Lone-wolf Police who are too busy stopping and arresting singe women , so that they can rape and murder them in their own areas.
Brixtonwoman - 6-Oct-21 @ 8:46 AM
GDPR in the UK has become another tool of the oppressors.
Police are denying requests for body camera footage on the grounds that the company that collected it has copyright, even when criminal charges have been laid.
Police are refusing Subject Access Data Requests.
Police are refusing the right to be rectified. I have been in court about this. I am not represented. Anyone else?
Dragon - 16-Apr-21 @ 12:32 PM